In today’s digital world, photographs of people are as ephemeral as the time of their taking. Images are so common that the majority have little intrinsic meaning or value. For Julie and Morris, images of the people they loved had a very different value. They were rare, and given as tokens of affection and remembrance. Ownership of the image was shared, the person might take it back if the relationship soured. Because of the physical distance between Julie and Morris, images play an important role right from the beginning.
In the course of their letters, they discuss miniatures painted on ivory and the daguerreotype, which had entered the stage in 1839. It was still a very uncertain process, however, and rare.
In 1848, Morris writes: “Speaking of pictures puts me in mind of my daguerreotype. I have had four taken in my life time besides the two you have, and of those four, not one remains perfect. By some chance they have all come back to me and every one has been spoiled and discoloured by the air. I hope that those you have have not suffered a like fate. Yours is as when first taken. I wish that some more experienced artist would visit Rochester and make it his abode, that we might procure more perfect ones.”
I have not examined our collection of daguerreotype, but it is possible that those early ones still exist. If ever there were miniatures on ivory, they have vanished, however. I do find the Rochester reference an amusing foreshadowing.
Comments Off on Concerning daguerreotypes